Skip to main content

Video · Brian Kim

Index Funds vs Stocks | Stock Market For Beginners

Brian compares index funds against picking individual stocks — diversification, the track record of active stock-picking, and who each approach actually fits.

Check Your Options Watch on YouTube

Get more videos + funding tips like this

Our weekly money brief — new videos, guides, and rate updates. Unsubscribe anytime.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy and to receive emails from ClearValue Lending. Unsubscribe anytime.

Published on YouTube April 17, 2023 · 10:34 · Text on this page updated · About 5 min read

Key points from the video

  • In rising (bull) markets index funds usually beat stock picking; in falling (bear) markets active management tends to do better. Because the market rises more often than it falls, index funds generally win.
  • The goals differ: stock picking tries to beat the market, index investing tries to match it. If your goal is to beat the market, an index fund alone cannot get you there.
  • Warren Buffett bet that an S&P 500 index fund would beat five hedge-fund picks over 2008 to 2017, and won. He tells most investors to use low-cost index funds.
  • Brian cites S&P's research that most active managers trail their benchmarks over 5 and 10 years, though more of them beat the market in the 2022 downturn.
  • To avoid mistakes with index funds: think long term and keep contributing, especially in bad years. A core-and-satellite mix of index funds and a few picked stocks is a reasonable middle ground.

Summarized from Brian's own words in the video.

What's changed since this video

Video published April 17, 2023. Checked against current sources on October 13, 2026. These updates are from the ClearValue Lending Team, not Brian.

  • Buffett's bet: the annual numbers Changed

    In the video: The five funds averaged 36% over ten years (about 3.6% a year); the index fund gained 125% (12.5% a year).

    Now: Berkshire's final tally: the five funds-of-funds gained 36.3% on average over the decade; the S&P 500 index fund gained 125.8%. Compounded, the index fund's average annual gain was 8.5%, not 12.5%. Dividing a ten-year total by ten overstates the yearly figure.

    Source: Berkshire Hathaway 2017 shareholder letter ("The Bet") · as of

  • Active manager scorecards For comparison

    In the video: S&P's report: 84% of active funds trailed their benchmark over 5 years, 90% over 10; 49% beat the market in 2022.

    Now: S&P Dow Jones Indices updates its SPIVA scorecard twice a year. Its site blocks automated reads, so we could not re-check the current figures; treat Brian's numbers as of early 2023 and see the latest scorecard directly.

    Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices — SPIVA U.S. scorecard · as of

  • Investing through bad years Still current

    In the video: Keep contributing when the market crashes; it is the best time to deploy money.

    Now: Still a common approach. FINRA notes that investing a fixed amount on a schedule (dollar-cost averaging) can soften short-term swings, though lump-sum investing often earns more over long periods. In a 401(k), you already invest as you earn.

    Source: FINRA — Dollar-cost averaging · as of

Reader guide · ClearValue Lending Team

Index funds vs. picking stocks: a plain-English guide

ClearValue Lending Team· Scored against ClearValue's published methodology·Updated

Brian's video asks which works better: buying the whole market through an index fund, or picking individual stocks. His answer is that index funds win for most people, most of the time, but not for every goal. This guide follows the video in order and adds what primary sources say today. Market statistics in the video are Brian's, as of April 2023.

Who wins depends on the market

Brian covers this in the video · watch from 0:00

Brian starts with the short answer. In a rising (bull) market, index funds usually beat stock pickers. In a falling (bear) market or a crash, active managers tend to do better.

The market rises more often than it falls. Brian says the stock market rose in 40 of the past 50 years. He puts the average bull market at about 3 years and the average bear market at about 10 months, noting that the figures change with the period you measure. These are his figures.

So which is better?

Brian covers this in the video · watch from 1:04

If index funds usually win in rising markets, and markets usually rise, index funds win more often. Brian agrees with that conclusion for most people.

But he says it is not one-size-fits-all. People have different goals, and the right tool depends on yours. Index funds generally outperform. That does not make them the only answer for everyone.

Beat the market, or match it?

Brian covers this in the video · watch from 2:07

This is the core difference. Stock picking, or active management, tries to beat the market. Index investing tries to match it, nothing more and nothing less.

So if your goal is to be a superior investor, an S&P 500 index fund alone cannot get you there. Brian notes that some investors do beat the market year after year. Most, amateur and professional, fall short, even in bear markets.

The other side of the trade-off is risk. A handful of stocks puts more of your money on fewer companies. That concentration is what makes beating the market possible, and also what makes big losses possible.

Warren Buffett's ten-year bet

Brian covers this in the video · watch from 3:05

Buffett says most investors are better off with index funds than picking stocks. In December 2007 he bet a New York money manager, Protégé Partners, that an S&P 500 index fund would beat a selection of hedge funds over ten years, after all fees. The bet ran from 2008 through 2017.

Protégé picked five funds-of-funds, which together held stakes in more than 200 hedge funds. Over the ten years they gained 36.3% on average. The index fund gained 125.8%. Afterward Buffett wrote that both small and large investors should stick with low-cost index funds.

The result, per $100,000 invested
InvestmentTen-year gainWhat $100,000 became
S&P 500 index fund125.8%$225,800
Best of the five funds-of-funds87.7%$187,700
Average of the five36.3%$136,300
Worst of the five2.8%$102,800
The result, per $100,000 invested. Gains from Berkshire Hathaway 2017 shareholder letter ("The Bet"). Dollar amounts computed by ClearValue Lending. One fund was liquidated in 2017; Berkshire reports its gain over nine years.

One correction to the video. Brian turns the ten-year totals into yearly figures by dividing by ten (3.6% and 12.5%). Compounded, Berkshire reports the index fund's average annual gain as 8.5%. The conclusion does not change.

What the S&P 500 has returned

Brian covers this in the video · watch from 4:20

Brian gives his long-run figures, with dividends reinvested: about 10.4% a year over 50 years, 9.7% over 30 years and 10.3% over 20 years. His takeaway is consistency: roughly 9% to 10% a year over long periods.

Treat those as history, not a forecast. They are averages over decades that include very bad years. The S&P 500 index fund in Buffett's bet, for example, averaged 8.5% a year over 2008 to 2017, a period that began with the 2008 crash.

If index funds are new to you, Brian suggests a beginner's video first. Our guide to his index funds vs. ETFs video covers how the funds themselves work.

How active managers actually do

Brian covers this in the video · watch from 5:25

Brian cites S&P's research on active managers, as of early 2023: 84% of actively managed funds trailed their benchmark over five years and about 90% over ten years. S&P noted that too much trading, which compounds mistakes, is one reason. Brian expects the same problem is worse for amateur stock pickers.

There is an exception. In 2022, a falling market, Brian says 49% of active managers beat the market. His explanation: in a rising market, holding the winners works, and index funds do that automatically. When the market turns, or money rotates from one sector to another (say, from tech to value stocks), skilled pickers can move faster.

Costs are part of the story. Active funds usually charge more than index funds, and the fee comes out every year whether or not the manager wins.

Two ways not to get index investing wrong

Brian covers this in the video · watch from 7:04

Brian says index investing suits most people and is hard to get wrong. Yet people do. His two rules:

  1. Think long term. His return figures are over 20 to 50 years. Over a short period, one bad year can crush a portfolio. He names 1974 (down 29%), 2002 (down 23%) and 2008 (down 38%).
  2. Keep contributing, especially in bad years. A crash is the best time to put money in and the worst time to stop. Missing those years drags down long-run returns.

Investing a fixed amount on a schedule is called dollar-cost averaging. FINRA notes it can reduce the impact of short-term swings, while a lump sum invested right away often earns more over long periods. If you invest through a 401(k), you are already doing this with each paycheck.

The core-and-satellite middle ground

Brian covers this in the video · watch from 8:38

Brian says it does not have to be all or nothing. In a core-and-satellite approach, most of your money sits in index funds (the core), and a smaller part goes to stocks you pick (the satellites). Some people say to keep 100% in index funds. Brian sees the mix as an acceptable middle ground.

He also flips it around for himself. He enjoys researching stocks, so picked stocks are his core. He uses index funds to fill gaps. If his picks lean heavily toward tech, he might add a real estate (REIT) index fund. The same works for energy, bonds, international stocks or pharmaceuticals.

Whichever way you do it, check the whole portfolio from time to time. Picks that do well can grow into a bigger share than you intended.

Next steps

Educational information, not investment, tax or legal advice. ClearValue Lending is an education and comparison platform; it does not manage money or recommend specific investments. Past returns do not predict future returns.

Questions viewers ask

Do index funds beat stock picking?

Usually, over long periods. Brian says index funds tend to win in rising markets, and markets rise more often than they fall. Active managers can do better in downturns or sector rotations.

What is the difference between active and passive investing?

Active investing (stock picking) tries to beat the market. Passive investing (index funds) tries to match a market index, at low cost.

Who won Warren Buffett's bet against hedge funds?

Buffett. From 2008 through 2017 his S&P 500 index fund gained 125.8% (8.5% a year), while the five funds-of-funds chosen by Protégé Partners gained 36.3% on average, according to Berkshire's 2017 letter.

How many active fund managers beat the market?

A minority over long periods. Brian cites S&P research from early 2023: about 84% trailed their benchmark over five years and 90% over ten. S&P's SPIVA scorecard has the latest figures.

Do active managers do better in a bear market?

Often more of them beat the index then. Brian says 49% did in 2022, a falling market, versus about 10% over the prior decade.

What average return should I expect from the S&P 500?

No return is promised. Brian cites long-run averages around 9% to 10% a year with dividends reinvested, but those are history, include bad years, and depend on the period. The index fund in Buffett's bet averaged 8.5% a year over 2008–2017.

Should I keep investing when the market crashes?

Brian says yes: a crash is the best time to contribute and the worst time to stop. Investing a fixed amount on a schedule can soften short-term swings.

What is a core-and-satellite portfolio?

Most of your money in broad index funds (the core) and a smaller part in individual stocks or narrower funds (the satellites). It lets you pick some stocks without betting everything on them.

Can index funds add diversification to a stock portfolio?

Yes. Brian uses sector or asset index funds, such as a REIT fund, to fill gaps when his picks lean too heavily toward one area like tech.

Why do most active funds trail their benchmark?

Higher fees and frequent trading are two reasons. Brian cites S&P noting that too much trading compounds mistakes, and active funds usually charge more than index funds every year.

Full transcript

From YouTube's auto-generated English captions, cleaned for punctuation and paragraphs. Brian's words are unchanged except for clear caption errors; text in [brackets] marks an editor's insertion or audio the captions did not catch.

Read the full transcript (1,782 words)

Editor's note: This video is from April 2023. The market statistics (yearly gains, bull- and bear-market lengths, S&P's active-manager percentages, the worst years) are Brian's figures as of then; we did not re-verify each one. His Buffett-bet annual figures are simple averages; Berkshire reports the index fund's compounded annual gain as 8.5%. At the end Brian mentions his own investing site, which is separate from ClearValue Lending.

Index funds vs stock picking watch from 0:00

In today's video, we're going to get to the bottom of this. Index funds versus stocks, which one is better? Index fund investing or stock picking? Which one produces better results? I'm going to save you the drama. I'm going to tell you right now. Generally speaking, when the stock market is going up, when you're in a bull market, an index fund will outperform stock picking. When the stock market is going down, when you have a bear market or a crash, stock picking or active managements outperforms index funds. Now, you have to know this piece. This is so important. The stock market goes up more than it goes down.

So, in the past 50 years, the stock market has gone up in 40 of those 50 years. The average duration of a bull market is 3 years. The average duration of a bear market is 10 months. Of course, the time frame that you're looking at when you're analyzing it, of course, that's going to change the figures, but generally speaking, it's in that range.

When to use each strategy watch from 1:04

So, I'll tell you this. Even if you're not a beginner in the stock market, what I just told you is very educational information. That's very insightful. But even if you're equipped with that knowledge, does it answer the question, which one is better? Index fund investing or stock picking? Well, you could make the arguments that I just said that index funds, you know, they outperform when the stock market is going up and the stock market goes up more than it goes down. So, you can deduce that index fund investing is better. If that's what you're thinking, that in most situations and for most people, I would say that I agree with you and I would say that you're absolutely right.

However, this is not one size fits all. People have different goals. People have different financial objectives. So, does index fund investing generally outperform stock picking? And the answer is yes. Is index fund investing for everyone then? I would say no, and I'll tell you why.

Goals of active vs passive watch from 2:07

So, you at the very base at the very foundation of this, you have to understand the fundamental difference. What is the purpose of stock picking or active management? The purpose is to beat the market. So, what is the purpose of index fund investing? It is to match the performance of the market, nothing more or nothing less. So, if your goal is to become a superior investor, then you can't just stick all your money to an index fund that tracks the S&P 500 because if you do that, then you're never going to beat the markets, and you will never achieve your goal. So, we're going to play devil's advocate here.

So, the reality of the situation is that a lot of people, amateurs and pros, attempt to outperform the markets. And some investors, they do. They consistently beat the market even in bull markets. But, the majority of investors fail miserably even in bear markets. So,

Warren Buffett's famous bet watch from 3:05

people want to become the next Warren Buffett, and you know, I don't blame them. So, you This is actually a good segment to tell you what Warren Buffett thinks about index fund investing. So, Warren Buffett says that most investors are better off using index funds instead of trying to pick stocks. In 2007, Warren Buffett was so confident about this that he made a wager. Buffett bet a New York City money management firm that over the next 10 years, an S&P 500 index fund would do better than five hedge funds. So, fees, expenses, and all that would be taken into consideration. So, the wager went from 2008 to 2017.

After the 10 years, the five funds had an average return of 36% over those 10 years. So, that's about a 3.6% return annually. Buffett went with the Vanguard index fund tracking the S&P 500. It went up 125%. That's 12 and 1/2% a year. So, after the conclusion of that wager, Buffett wrote a letter to shareholders. He said that small and large investors should stick with low-cost index funds.

Market performance data watch from 4:20

Now, I want to pause here for a second. I know that we're already deep into this video, but I want to tell you this. I'm just trying to be helpful. If you do not have a solid understanding of index fund investing, like the pros and cons, please check out my video about index funds for beginners. It's going to do you a lot of good, and this video would make a lot more sense if you watch that video first. But, moving on, I want to give you some hard facts. These are the stats. Over the past 50 years, the S&P 500 index has averaged an annual gain of 10.4%.

So, this assumes that dividends were reinvested. Over the past 30 years, it's averaged an annual gain of 9.7%. Over the past 20 years, it's averaged an annual gain of 10.3%. So, if you noticed, it's pretty consistent. 20 years, 30 years, 50 years, 9 to 10% returns. So, that's what you can expect. And I think that Well, I think that's a good sample size.

Active management in bear markets watch from 5:25

So, here's some more stats for you. The Standard & Poor's has been tracking the record of active managers. In their report last year, they cite that after 5 years, 84% of actively managed funds have underperformed their benchmarks. So, they're not cherry-picking the data, either. They're not cherry-picking it with the 5-year time frame, because when you look at the 10-year when you look at a 10-year time frame, it's actually 90% of active managers underperform. So, it's actually worse. They noted that one reason one of the various reasons why is because fund managers they do too much trading which compounds investing mistakes. So, I imagine that it's the same thing is probably amplified with amateur stock pickers as well.

However, as I told you before, active management outperforms when the stock market is going down. So, in the past 10 years, only 10% of active managers have beat the markets. But in 2022, when the stock market was going down, 49% of active managers beat the markets. So, I want to tell you what's going on. When the stock market is going up, the easiest way to make money is to keep riding the wave with the same winning stocks. And that's something that index funds do automatically. But when the stock market abruptly shifts from bull market to bear market, that stops working. Or if there's a rotation from one sector to another, let's just say from tech stocks to value stocks, stock pickers are better at picking the winners in that rotation. So, those are the stats. That's the situation and you can interpret the data however you please.

Best practices for index investing watch from 7:04

Now, this is my recommendation to you. Index fund investing is appropriate for most people. In my opinion, it's hard to screw up index fund investing, but you'd be surprised because people do it all the time. So, I want to tell you how to not screw up index fund investing. So, the first thing is that you need to have a long-term approach, a long-term mentality. So, I told you the returns over that time frame, those time frame, 20 years, 30 years, 50 years. Even if the stock market crashes, if you take a long-term approach, it's all going to even out. But if you don't have a long-term mentality, you could get hit by a very bad year and it could crush your portfolio.

So, in 1974, the stock market went down 29%. In 2002, it went down 23%. In 2008, the market went down 38%. One bad year, it could devastate your returns if you have a short-term approach. The second thing that I recommend is that if you're going to be an index fund investor, then you have to stay consistent with your contributions. This is important because if the stock market crashes in a given year, that is actually the best time for you to deploy your money. That is the worst time for you to not contribute. And if you're not consistent and you miss that year, that's going to really drag down your overall returns. Okay, so that is how you minimize your chances of screwing up index fund investing. I don't want to I don't want that to happen to you.

The core-satellite approach watch from 8:38

Now, the second thing I want to say is that and this is my opinion. When it comes to index fund investing, you don't have to make it an all or nothing approach. A lot of people use a strategy and it's called the core and satellite approach. So, this is when you invest the bulk of your money in index funds, but you're still allocating some money to pick stocks that you think will be winners. So, some people disagree with this and they say that you should invest 100% of your money in index funds because you know, it's better. But, I see the core and satellite approach as a good and acceptable middle ground.

Also, if you want to actively manage your own portfolio, like you want to pick stocks, I want to give you a recommendation. So, I personally pick stocks because I enjoy doing the research. I like studying the trends. I mean, a lot of that is what I share on YouTube. And honestly, I would be doing this research anyways even if I was not on YouTube. So, I pick stocks. However, I will use index funds to complement my stock picks. So, I want to give you an example. Let's just say that I pick a bunch of tech stocks, right? And I realize that, hey, my portfolio is really tech-heavy.

I need to add some real estate exposure to my portfolio. Then I can buy an index fund for REITs. It would be the same story if I wanted to add exposure to energy or bonds or international or even pharmaceuticals. It could be used as a complement to whatever you're lacking. So, in this scenario, index funds are the satellites in addition to your core holdings, which are the stocks that you pick and actively manage. So, that's the way I see it. That's the way I treat it. So, if you do want to see my stock picks and you want exclusive investing content, please check out our website. It's clearvalueinvesting.com. Going to leave a link down below. Please subscribe. I thank you for the support. I wish you a very nice day. Take care.

Where the ClearValue Lending team would start

Brian's video covers the strategy. Here's where our published methodology points business owners next — chosen for fit, not commissions.

https://clearvaluelending.com/resources/videos/smxnkvui3ba